Sony Smart Watch 3 Quick Review
Brief: Sony shows why screen tech matters
Price: £105 for a rubber strap one but £195 for metal.
Specifications: OS Android Wear,
Display Resolution 320 x 320, Colors 16 bit, Diagonal Size 1.6",
Transflective TFT LCD, Dimensions 36mm x 10mm x 51mm, Weight Watch
Module 38g, Sport armband 36g, Battery 420mAh, Processor 1.2 GHz,
Quad-core ARM® Cortex™ A7, Water and Dust Resistance IP68, Memory 4GB
eMMC with 512 MB RAM, Ports & Connectors Micro USB, Connectivity
Bluetooth 4.0, WiFi ready, Sensors Ambient Light, Accelerometer,
Magnetometer, Gyro, GPS, Vibration Motor, Microphone
Accessories: Err you can change
the bands but they are over £30, oh hell no! The metal, the one I
wanted to get has never been separately available so boo to Sony.
What’s more, curiously there is very little in the way of accessories on
eBay too. Basically the strap you get with the watch had better be a
colour you can live with. (Cough, fluorescent yellow, cough.)
Build Quality: Very snugly put
together and I really can’t fault the construction, the design of the
charging flap I could but the construction of everything is very nice.
Aesthetics: Sigh. For some reason
the metal one is massively more costly than the black one and despite
Sony saying the metal strap would become available, it has not. The
metal one looks so pretty in pictures. Still, my black one isn’t ugly.
It is very plain, functional, utilitarian even. Not sure the yellow or
pink ones I’d love so much but black is pretty inoffensive to most.
UI: Works very well, Android Wear
is clearly at its best on a rectangular screen. Obviously Android Wear
is Android Wear regardless of the device but rectangular screens are
just plain better at fitting in data than round ones are, it is that
simple. As such it was a joy to use on the 3.
Functionality: The lack of a heart
rate sensor will be missed by some but its traded for an inbuilt GPS
receiver. So if you run or cycle a lot I’d think that GPS would be more
useful than the odd look at your heart rate. Still it is odd that it’s
not there. Qi is also missing and that I really missed a great deal.
However you do get that screen, a screen you can actually use in
sunshine, with ease too. That is a pretty massive boon.
Battery: Mostly fantastic. It’s a
little bigger than the 360 but mostly it’s that screen. The
transflective nature means it doesn’t have to power up the backlight to
make it visible, so it saves a ton of power unlike normal displays.
Connectivity: Bluetooth 4.0
naturally, Micro USB, NFC and Wi-Fi. Bluetooth is the main one for
speaking to your phone. Wi-Fi for when your phone isn’t near, it can
use Wi-Fi for data, streaming music say or to still speak to your
distant phone. Micro USB for err charging really. Lastly NFC, I’d like
to say Google Pay use is coming but given Google Wallets hatred of all
non Americans I won’t hold my breath. Really, it’s just there to pair
easily to your phone or headphones.
Value: For £105 just buy one. No
Qi is a pain but for that screen, it makes it useable in way no other
Android Wear devices are. Bargain.
Pro’s: That screen. Screen gives great battery life. Screen actually visible in sunshine.
Con’s: Utilitarian aesthetic, not very dressy. No Qi charging. No heartrate monitor.
No comments:
Post a Comment