Nokia / Microsoft Lumia 735 Review
First Impressions: Since my last brief
time with a windows phone I rather fancied another. With the 735 having
come down in price and with the Fitbit offer on I was tempted. Then
learning that the 735 has an OLED screen and I was sold on getting one.
I do love an OLED screen. Though I will confess that actually getting
one was a right old pain in the posterior. EE had them up on their web
site for £130 plus a mandatory £20 top up. Oh but they had no stock, on
the phone then and they could not order one for when stock came in. So
to the website, it never said not in stock but would give the delivery
estimate as 14 – 21 days. So then off to a store, I was going to be
near Ocean Terminal (shopping centre, where HMY Britannia is docked) so I
could pop in and see if they had one. They did. Oh but it takes a
nano sim and they didn’t have any PAYG nano sim’s. They therefore could
not sell me it. Honestly EE, I see you’re already preparing to give
the same high standard of customer service that BT customers have
enjoyed for years, for when they take you over. After politely asking
the poor girl in the shop if since they have 3 stores on Princes Street
alone she might phone them and find if one of them might possibly have
the phone and the required sim in stock. I’m somewhat glossing over
elements but suffice to say, EE you did not make a good showing of
yourself on that Monday afternoon.
Finally
getting home and opening the thing, the box was almost identical to
that of the 635. Same small box, inside the phone, micro USB cable and a
charging plug. It’s a tidy little package. Sim in, battery in, back
clipped on and voila. Actually the back, Nokia (well Microsoft now)
really know how to make a plastic backing clip together snuggly. I’ve
seen early commentary of the 735 mistake it as being a unibody device.
It feels really solid in the hand. Nokia have long had a reputation for
impeccable build and this is a real example of that, just excellent.
All things considered it really makes for an excellent first impression.
I’ve now had the thing for a few weeks
and so I guess I must press on with the various aspects of the device
other than just its build quality.
Hardware: Well you really can’t fault
it. The thing is solid and feels much more of a premium device. The
only issue, and it feels a bit petty to raise as an issue but the only
thing that lets you tell this isn’t a high end device is its screen
resolution. Now I like an OLED screen with the high contrast and
perfect blacks. The screen here is very, very good. The screen isn’t
super-duper bright which I put down to Nokia’s “clear black” which I
believe is basically that they use darkened glass on the front. The
colours are crisp, vibrant and just so, well colourful!!! Oh I do love
OLED displays, I really, really do. The only bit that isn’t super great
is that the resolution is only 720p. Now it’s not like it’s horrible
but next to the Nexus 5 with its 1080p screen but you can see the
difference. It’s not something that leaps out at you but you can tell
if you look closely. As downsides go that’s really it, the CPU and ram
are both mid-range spec’s but you would never notice it. The CPU is
easily zippy enough and Windows Phone is a very light and snappy felling
OS. The RAM, its only 1GB but windows is very frugal with RAM and as
it likes to freeze apps not on screen it hasn’t the same RAM hunger that
Android has. The crazy good build quality along with feeling so fast
you could very well believe it was a much more expensive device than it
was. The camera on the back, well it’s a bit mid rangey. It’s only a
6.7 mega pixel but it reminds you it has Zeiss optics in there. The
front camera, this was for a time labelled as the “selfie” phone.
Probably because the 635 was bashed for having no front facing camera,
Nokia slapped in a 5 mega pixel one. It is all a really nice little
bundle.
Audio Software: With it being windows
phone there is not the assortment one might find elsewhere. Normally
when I use a phone for audio, really only for review purposes, I use
Google Music. I tend to live in Google’s world so for me its easy
access to my music and just my music, no endless random stuff I
don’t know well. New music is great but not when you’re trying to
critically assess something it’s not! Hitting Google I found the “best”
Google Music app. Right now though it’s broken. So great start there.
Since I have Deezer preinstalled I
thought I’d give it a go. It seems to be a Pandora like service, but
not very good. The Muppets “Happy Song” really??? Maybe it’s that I’ve
not given it long enough to get to know me? I mean it’s on the whole
not a bad offering and it did pluck out some songs I like. Over time it
did grow on me but still a bit random at times. There is of course the
ubiquitous Spotify available too. There is also the really quite good
MixRadio from Nokia. They are all the same sort of thing. Pandora
itself though refused to install, sad face.
Moving on to my own music, added to a
little SD card I had to hand, I put on some stuff. Naturally I had to
convert all the FLAC files before into WMA lossless because WP8.1 still
doesn’t support FLAC. Though the soonish coming Windows phone 10
apparently will. One of the files was a high res, 96k 24bit file too
and I’m pleased to say the phone in the default Xbox music app played it
fine. I know it probably doesn’t matter on a phone but nice to know
that it can handle it.
Audio Hardware: In a completely
non-objective fashion, I’ve just picked up the first IEM I saw on my
desk (Alclair Curve) and I don’t hate it. I’ve spent half the day
playing with the quite excellent RS185 so I expected my ears to wretch a
little on testing the phone but it’s not at all bad. I’d love to tell
you what hardware is in it but trying to find out, god you’d think I was
asking for Bill Gates’s bank details. Anyway, it sounds pretty damn
decent.
Lows: They have a surprising amount of
energy to them. I note that from memory it’s not too unlike what I
encountered in the 635. They both run Snapdragon 400’s so maybe they
have the same audio hardware? I would love to know but Microsoft were
monumentally unhelpful. It’s inclined to a vigorous, colder more
aggressive style. It wants to drive the Curve’s to a quick punchy
place. Hmm with the sumptuous Curve’s it works very well. I love
pairing contrastingly styled DAP’s and IEM’s so throwing any warm IEM
would be a good idea, of which there are boatloads. Think the Momentum
In-Ears, or pretty much anything Sony make. Warm softness gets a good
stiff rod up its back and it’s fantastic for quick bouncy pop. The 735
rhythmically wants the music to go fast so it’s good to add some
softness and slowness. With more snappy headphones it all becomes a
little too fast paced. Too punchy too, you need a bit of softness to
mellow and balance them. Depth wise it’s not awesome, it hasn’t the amp
power to drive deep sumptuous lows but the pithy smack the bass likes
to give means you don’t really want or notice the lack of furthest
depths. Odds are it won’t be paired to the best quality headphones
anyway.
Mids: A little on the chilly side
tonally. Much like the bass there is an inclination towards a more
direct, clean, punchy and “assertive” sound. All of which is good by me
as I like DAP’s, to be clean and headphones to provide the warmth. For
a phone it’s safe to assume they will mostly be encountering lower end,
mainstream quality earphones, which I would presume to be warm and bass
heavy. The cool dryness applied to the vocals here then should aid
them greatly in clarity. Give them a bit of width and dry air, give
them a little chance to breathe. So long as you stick to warm and
fairly easy to drive things then you can’t go wrong. If you insist on
cooler and harder to drive, like the RE-0 then mids don’t have the
breadth to them. The plucky little Nokia does a really admirable job
with the RE-0’s I must say but it’s noticeable that they just don’t have
the proper power behind them to really sing. Still a breathy and airy
valiant effort.
Highs: Since I’ve still got the RE-0’s
out, the highs are pretty bloody good. Of course the RE-0 are doing
most of the heavy lifting as they have about the best highs of any IEM
ever but….. that means the 735 is feeding them a pretty reasonable
signal. It’s got detail, it’s got refinement (okay so some of that
refinement is due to the 0 being so hard to drive) it’s a bit of a shock
really. What are Nokia/Microsoft putting in the Lumia’s in terms of
audio hardware? I tried asking them but they were about as helpful as a
bag of cats. Otherwise I’m still inclined towards tame treble’s, its
relatively crisp nature means that highs are a touch hard. As I’m
inclined to warm IEM’s anyway I find it a natural and complimentary
pairing. You know it reminds me greatly of the output of the 1G Ipod
Shuffle. A little brash and brittle but for the money / fact it’s a
phone I’m pretty impressed.
Soundstage/Instrument separation: Sound
staging is fairly so so. It’s not got the power to give things the
scale they ought to, even with the Senn IE7’s it was rather middling.
Instrument separation though is pretty good. For a phone it’s really
actually pretty decent stuff.
Battery Life: Epic. I have no idea what
it does that is radically different but with, admittedly not lots of
use, it lasts days. Maybe it’s the amolod screen and having lots of
black? Either way it’s easily the best battery life I’ve had from a
smart phone. What’s more if that’s not good enough for you, you can
always use the handy wireless charging to top it up. If that’s still
not enough, you can just buy a spare battery to shove in it if the need
arises.
Build Quality: As the last of the
Nokia’s it holds true to its pedigree. It’s got a removable plastic back
but you’d never know to hold it in your hands. It looks and both feels
first rate
UI: I’ve currently got a build of
windows 10 running on it. It’s not really all that different from 8.1.
If you have a played with a windows phone of any kind you’ll get the
gist of things. It’s all about tiles and a simple list of apps in the
main drawer. It is simple, simple stuff. It’s a hair more customisable
than iOS but nothing like the options you have with Android. It is
fast and fluid feeling but it’s a little on the simple side for me, nice
of course but I like to tweak things. Windows Phone really doesn’t let
you tweak very much.
In The Hand: I’m not sure I love the
very square thing, yes it’s visually impressive but otherwise the thing
is nicely curved on the back and the front glass is too. Ever so
gently, a bit like was on the Nexus 4, the front glass edges just slop
away so our fingers can glide right off to the sides. I very much like.
Format Support: I can’t be arsed trying
them all but it should play mp3’s just fine and aac’s too. Annoyingly
it doesn’t support FLAC, with the advent of 128GB SD cards you might
want to but MS promises FLAC support is coming with WP10.
Volume: I can’t say I encountered
anything it couldn’t drive more than loud enough, it was regularly in
the 20’s out of 30 though. Oh also note, while it could get loud
enough, it wasn’t always powering things super well and so I found I
would crank the volume dial a bit just to get that additional power
rather than for the added loudness.
Accessories: It doesn’t come with anything bar a charger. You want anything else, buy it.
Speaker: It is adequately loud. Its
quality isn’t horrific, I wouldn’t choose to ever to listen to music on
it but it doesn’t distort to hell if you max the volume.
Camera: I’m no photographer but the rear
6.7MP with Carl Zeis lenses is pretty good. For a mid-range handset.
6.7MP isn’t very high but the Zeiss lenses mean they have paid at least a
bit of attention to it. Its photos look okay to me. Comparting to the
Moto G then to my eye it’s the better of the two but brand name lenses
or not, it’s a midrange handset. The front one, well it’s a whopping
5MP which is huge for a front facing camera. To my eyes its looks not
bad at all for a front camera but I really am no photographer. Still
verses the Moto G it is plain and simply better, so if “selfies” matter
big time to you, take note.
The Good: There is so much to like about
the 735 there really is. Taking it as one whole. I very much the
device, I really honestly do. Could it ever be my main device, oh hell
no, not a snowballs chance in hell!!! The hardware is just what you
expect from “Nokia” (incidentally this is the last Nokia branded
phone.) It may be plastic and have a removable back but the thing is
lush in the hand. If you handed it to someone and told them it’s a
unibody phone they would easily believe you. Its not but you’d never
know by the look or feel of the thing. Then you look at its screen and
yes, it’s “only” a 720p screen but it is AMOLED so it pops. Colours are
so vibrant and black are infinitely black. It’s gorgeous. In short I
love the hardware. The OS, meh, not so much. It’s not that WP is bad,
it’s not, it’s just so locked down, even more so that iOS is. Anyway
this isn’t a WP review.
The good you can summarise as the
hardware, its great in the hand, looks like it costs waaaaaaay more than
it did and the screen is a stunner. The audio hardware too, I found
myself taking a real liking to too. Even if Microsoft’s PR people are a
bunch of expletives. Honestly trying to find out what audio bits are
inside, you’d think I’d just asked them what position their mother likes
best.
The Bad: This is not and will not be a
WP review. However being a Lumia 735 review and sadly the bad is that
WP still feels unfinished. Yes I realise 10 is unfinished but random
little things you just can’t do. However this isn’t a WP so I’m not
going to list its issues, you know what they are in relation to the
other two and you know what the benefits are. It terms of the hardware
here, it’s a lovely device. If it had ran android, this and not the
Moto G would have been the go to bargain phone, no question. The fact
is for near identical money and spec the 735 is leaps and bounds the
nicer device.
Value: Excellent. For £150 if you don’t
want Android then grab one of these. Side by side with an Iphone 5 I
have here, metal vs plastic aside (personally I prefer the plastic) the
735 is so easily the much more pleasant device. So many of the initial
impressions of the 735 at its launch had people stating it was a unibody
design. It is not. That the back is removable so easily, so battery
swappable yet is all so nicely done is testament to the knowhow of
Nokia’s many years of phone constructing. It is a nice object and if it
ran Android I’m sure it would have been a bigger sales success than the
Moto G.
Conclusion: As a phone, I like it rather
a lot. Well I do so long as you don’t mark it down for being a Windows
Phone. Yes it bugs me the things I want to do but that it can’t
because WP doesn’t let you do anything. In the same way it would be
wrong to hammer iOS for the some restrictions. The fact is not everyone
wants to change the launcher on their phone, they want it to look and
act exactly the way someone else decided it should be. The screen is
beautiful, the body is too and the internals make it all feel very
snappy. The hardware of the thing is really really nice. God if this
had android it would have sold in huge numbers.
Acoustically, I don’t know what magic
they are working but I’ve been a big fan of its light, crisp and clean
sounding output. Seeing as they have the same CPU I’m just assuming
it’s the same audio hardware too as was in the 635. I don’t have the
635 anymore so I can’t confirm but so far, they are the best sounding
mobile phones I’ve spent time listening to. Granted as of yet that
isn’t terribly many but still, this is good enough that I could use it
as a DAP and not want to kill myself. Its verging on not just being
“good for a phone” but being good for a DAP full stop.
If I
had any complaints or reservations really, it’s that the audio output
isn’t the most powerful that ever there was. If you connect things
really hard to drive (RE-0) then dynamics take a beating and it can
sound a little listless. However I am well impressed with the 735.
Pair it with a nicely warm IEM like the IE7 or Alclair Curve and you
have yourself a credible sounding, grown up audio set up. From a phone,
seriously!
No comments:
Post a Comment