Moto G 4G 1st edition Review
First Impressions: It had been
quite some time since I had played with a non Nexus Android phone. If
I’m truly honest the reason I liked the idea of the Moto G 4G was in
large part due to its reputation for being a rather Nexus like
experience. I wanted it to be a stock like, non rooted, no custom
ROM’d, no tweeked anything. The other aspect I was rather keen on was
its size. Its “just” a 4.5 inch screen which frankly is so much more
hand friendly. Given I once, back in the day, had a Dell Streak, the 5
inch phone back when 3.5 inches was the norm. That thing was massive,
just vast and I loved it. Then I began to realise I couldn’t use it one
handed and move at the same time. Yes its screen was fantastic but it
was just too big for me. With all phones going that way I rather liked
the idea of getting a hand sized phone. That version 2 of the Moto G
has grown to 5 inches makes me think that there may not be long to get a
smaller phone.
Given it was bought some time ago I really have next to no recollection of opening the box up. So let’s assume it was a wild and thrilling ride. It’s a box, inside was a phone.
Hardware: Spec wise it is the
benchmark for a mid-range handset for some time now. A Snapdragon 400,
1GB of RAM and 8GB of storage, it also has a micro SD card slot. The
screen is a 720p LCD. Notable the Moto G and the Lumia 735 are almost
identical hardware wise, only LCD vs AMOLED. While I much prefer OLED
screens the one on the Moto G is still pretty nice. Its colours are
good, its brightness is good and for all the huffing some might do about
it only being 720p screen the thing is 4.5 inches. 720p is absolutely
fine for the size. It’s nice but all rather ordinary. The 735, which I
fear I’m going to keep harking back to feels sooooooooooooo much
nicer. The Moto G is fine. It’s nice in the hand with its curved back,
it’s comfortable to hold and makes things easy to reach.
The hardware of the Moto G is, nice.
It’s fine, it’s pleasant, it’s a bit better than adequate. I feel I’m
damming it with faint praise. The thing is good, it is, it’s why it
sold in huge numbers and was the go to value Android phone. A
phone that isn’t just good for the money but good full stop. Yeah but
it’s not exciting a thing to have before you. It’s just all a bit
uneventful and bland. Again, yes its specs are all rather positive but I
just cannot get excited about the thing, I just can’t. On paper
however it’s all good. The CPU is the highly competent Snapdragon 400,
the 1GB of RAM that it can do 4G (I have the 4G version.) They all add
up to making a capable device that feels good to use, and it feels nice
in the hand.
It’s just not exciting.
Audio Software: Well, its Android
so you have at least 400 billion music app’s to play with. Of course
I’m inclined to go right to Google Music since it’s got only my music
there. It does have a streaming all of the world’s music option if you
pay but I’m just fine with only my own. Actually for reviewing it’s
much the preferred option. My preferences aside, you name it and it’s
available. Spotify, Deezer, Tidal, Blinkbox, Soundcloud etc etc etc.
You can of course always go old school and put music on the device and/or on its removable micro SD card.
Officially it supports up to 32GB but you should be able to stick in a
64GB one too if you format it in FAT32. Once on board your find that
any format you can think of there will be an app available that can play
it. Hear that Microsoft, Apple??? Can play any format!
Audio Hardware: I’m optimistic
that it might have the same audio bits that the 735 had. Since they are
both Snapdragon 400’s. What I most readily note right of is that the
Moto G 4G hisses like a bag of snakes. Bugger me you can hear the amp
going on and off as you flick about. Seriously noticeable. That
hopefully means they have tuned the amp inside for power so I’m note
going to bash it yet. Still if you hate hiss, sorry.
Lows: Ooooooh. Oh I think this
may well be the same bits as was in the 735. But the amp here is really
set to blast you with power. My god, there is some headroom for the
volume too. Right the bass, yes. I’m impressed. Since it’s a phone I
pulled out the IE8’s, and kappow!!! Woahh there is spades of power.
The IE8’s can shift some bass when you power them well and the little
Moto G, I’m gobsmacked. If feels like it’s the same as the 735 but with
the amp power cranked up. It vicious and potent. Grippy, violently
aggressive bass with oodles of savagery cloaked behind a layer of silk.
Bugger me, this is proper DAP good. Wow.
Okay so its maybe not totally reaching as low as it should.
It might also a be a little more punch happy than to keep a smooth low,
so it suggests its draining whatever little capacitor is on the amp but
hey I’m nit picking. It’s a phone, this is possibly the best phone
I’ve used. It’s just like the 735 but with the power cranked up.
Mids: There is an inclination
towards being a little tonally cool. Clarity gets a bump from that but
it is at the expense of expressiveness. They just aren’t capturing the
soul of the vocalist, they haven’t the range to breathe. Then I
remember I’m using a phone. Holy crap it’s good for a phone. Sure they
aren’t so creamily inclined, they just are a bit dead, gray, tasteless,
not fully expressible. Its like the vocalist just had to take their
beloved pet to the vet for the last time. They are going through the
motions but a little piece of their soul has just died inside them.
Sure on paper they are giving their vocals vigour but they are somehow a
little empty.
Nevertheless, aside from maybe being in a
slight dip overall the vocals are a little cool, little bit greyed but
otherwise I’m greatly impressed with the energy, dynamics and detail
they offer up. Gosh it’s a beast of a little amp inside.
Highs: Dazzlingly enthusiastic.
Sure I’d have to say a bit dry, bit cool and deep down a little bit
soulless. Still I’m in awe of the spectacle they can put on. The amp
has no problem launching the incredible IE8’s from one direction to the
next in an instant. Treble explodes across them with abandon then
blinks back out of existence like the shattered remnants of a high
energy proton-proton collision. That brief moment of wonder while
something new surges out of oblivion and in an instant it’s gone. There
is a reason I think the IE8 has one of the best treble of any IEM
ever. It can be awe inspiring when you throw power its way and the
little Moto G is doing an astounding job.
I want to complain that it’s a bit brittle or over edgy, over hard but it’s not, not with the IE8.
Sure I’d bet with a pair of ER4’s I might say different but I can’t
bring myself to try them. Well I can justify trying the HF3, ahh and
there’s that brittleness. Still I’m impressed with how well they power
the things. Ety’s just love power, and they are still remarkably good.
Soundstage/Instrument Separation:
It’s passable. On the IE8’s it was largish, when really it should have
been vast. The HF3 though isn’t teeny tiny, it’s powerful enough for
them to sound a little full. Again instrument separation is a bit
middling. The little amp may be wowing me but I think separation wise
we’ve reached the limit of what its DAC can offer.
Battery Life: Seeing as this isn’t
my main phone it doesn’t get hard heavy use. However it is in
continuous data use, hangouts and skype are both logged in so it’s in
moderate usage. Still the battery life is quite good. It stands up far
better than my Nexus 5 (though what doesn’t) so I can get away with
charging it every second or third day. A third day would be tight,
generally too tight for my liking but if you do forget to charge the
thing one night, you should make it through to next day.
Build Quality: Its fine. Like the
rest of the hardware it’s all fine. No, really, it really is fine.
It’s just not anything special or exciting
UI: I’d like to say thank you to
Motorola for pretty much not pissing about with the standard Android
UI. Why on earth handset makers all feel the desperate not to
“differentiate” their offerings I really don’t know. Not that in theory
having their own UI’s is a bad thing, it’s just that they tend to be
very lazy about keeping it up to date. What’s more, they seem to change
things just for the sake of being different, not because they think
they can do something better. Thus we have a pleasant and clean UI that
is stock like and Motorola kept its promise and has updated it to
Lollipop.
In The Hand: Where the 735 was
angular the Moto G is very curved, curved at the corners, curved on the
back and curved on the edges. Its pedestrian dimensions too compared
with most phones, yes its “only” a 4.5 inch screen, only. However it’s
just about perfect for my hands, its size, its rounded sides, its curved
back all make it just sit nicely. It’s comfortable to hold and
comfortable to reach just about anywhere on screen.
Format Support: It’s Android. You
name it, it’ll play it. So if you want to fill that micro SD card with
music you can without having to care what format things are in.
Volume: LOADS!!!! The amp has been cranked for power, if you want to deafen yourself you can do it with this no prob.
Accessories: It doesn’t come with
much, charger and USB cable and errr nothing. However you can find
plenty of things, cases, backs, backs with covers and what not all on
ebay. Just make sure you get for the right version.
Speaker: While the 2nd gen Moto G gets front facing speakers, this 1st
gen one does not. The speaker is, mildy adequate. Firing up Netflix
at max volume, could I hear The Good Wife? Yes I could but not
comfortably loud and certainly not loud enough that I could have put it
on while I do anything else.
Camera: It’s a 5 MP on the back,
1.3MP on the front. The camera works fine, it’ll take photos of
whatever. The front one is a bit so so. Comparing to the Lumia 735,
the Lumia gives the Moto a bit of a kicking here. Its gets the job done
but I can’t say I’m wildly impressed with it.
The Good: There is a reason the
Moto G has been since launch the go to, bargain Android handset. It’s
cheap, it’s pretty well spec’ed, it’s near stock and received updates,
it’s got a developer base too. Every aspect of it is not just good for
the money really good. It’s not a perfect device but there just isn’t
any area where it sucks. It’s pretty damn good in every way possible,
it’s the all-round great value package. So what’s the “Good” about
it? Well everything frankly.
The Bad: Erm, I like OLED screens more than LCD? There isn’t really anything bad about it.
Value: Excellent. You could maybe
argue the 735 is “better” but there is no way you can say the G is poor
value. Not to mention that with the 3rd gen one coming soon the price has plummeted for remaining 1st gen 4G’s.
Conclusion: It’s the all-round
bundle that is great everywhere. As a phone it’s great, its internals,
CPU, RAM all are good. In use it feels snappy mostly. You could swap a
flagship worth several times its price for this and not want to kill
yourself. It’s a genuinely good device, not just good for the money but
just plain good. Period.
Then to the audio, well whatever I suspect Qualcomm have paired with the Snapdragon 400, I like it.
It sounds very, very much like that of the 735 which I also loved. The
difference being that the G has waaaaaaaymore oomph behind it. now I
must confess I do not have a ROM that is a publicly certified one. So
maybe it isn’t compliant with the stupid French/EU loudness
restriction. Maybe that’s the difference, I really don’t know. Either
way the additional power available here is enough for the G to give the
Lumia a kicking. The cost is a bucket load of hiss but you don’t notice
unless it’s in quiet passages. Classical listeners will likely be
irked by it but I wasn’t.
So, Moto G 4G it’s an awesome little package.
Great at everything and dirt cheap for what you get. Its audio too is
top notch for a phone putting vastly more expensive devices to shame
(cough Iphone, cough.) it may not about with the warmth that some crave
but I like a DAP to be clean and open. Any warmth in the mix I like to
come from the earphones so for me it’s a perfectly competent, capable
DAP. From a phone!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment