Graham Slee Solo Ultra Linear Review
Thanks to Graham Slee for the loan.
First Impressions:  So out of the 
box it came and it’s a light little thing, or maybe it’s just light 
beside the power supply?  I have the upgraded PSU1 power supply and it’s
 a really heavy solid block.  God whatever’s in it, I feel like you 
could build houses with the thing.  So the amp, it looks kinda nice.  
Now I haven’t pre planned how I’m going to actually hook the thing up, 
I’m realising I probably should but too late now.  Right, ghetto 
solution it is.  Hp out of the E9 and to the AV inputs on the back of 
the amp.  A classy looking solution this is not but hey it’ll do till I 
can face spaghetti junction.
It seems sensible to pull out the HD600’s has they are quite easily the best big cans I have.  
 First thoughts on listening, please bare in mind I haven’t used the 600
 in a while so I do forget just how excellent they are sometimes.  I 
don’t know if it’s maybe just the tracks but things feel deeper and more
 holographic.  Highs seems super refined, highly easy on the ear yet 
just so choc full of detail.  It’s all completely uncritical non 
comparative listening so I know it means little but…… everything feels 
unquantifiably better.  Not brighter nor deeper lows nor more forward 
mids but I keep coming back to wanting to describe them as holographic. 
 These just feels something better and as I haven’t been able to quite 
swap back to just the E9 and actually do some proper critical listening I
 just cannot for the life of me put my finger on it.  Something 
effortless feeling somewhere.
Lows:  While I get the impression 
that the HD600’s are being better driven in the lows which when you get 
deep can cause issues for amps, there is something effortless.  As the 
only proper desktop amp I have, the E9 which I still think is super 
bargain levels of value, the Solo, well the Solo doesn’t even notice 
it.  In the way that a great battleship might sail unfettered right 
though a harbour of toy boats.  Playing with the Oppo PM-3’s and 
flicking back and forth it’s blisteringly apparent that the bass feels 
so much weaker on the E9, it just lacks the vigour and authoritative 
reach that the Solo gives it.   It’s not per say larger in the bass it 
just feels better are more articulated.  The E9 is struggling.  Honestly
 it’s most annoying for until the Solo I was very happy with the power 
the E9 was capable of delivering and new I’m thinking I’m forever going 
to be aware of what it lacks now.  
Quantitatively, the Solo actually feels perhaps a tiny fraction less bassy than the E9.  
 Less so that the bass is diminished but that it’s more cleanly 
delivered and therefore there is that hint less in the way of bass 
bloom.  The Solo isn’t particularly forgiving when it comes to low end 
articulation so you may want to try and feed it better quality stuff 
than some of the bass as is found on Miss Gaga’s tracks.
Mids:  It’s the same story as was 
with the bass.  The Solo feels like it is casually spiting it out at you
 and that its capable of doing vastly more should you ask it to.  The E9
 feels like it’s already giving you it’s all.  They are just not in the 
same class.  It also becomes more notable that the separation between 
what a grown up amp, hooked up to the mains can do that a portable one 
running off a battery cant.  Flowing, and effortlessly detailed.   It’s 
just all so openly expressive, Regina Spektors “Ballad Of A Politician” 
with its eclectic cacophony of sounds feels so wonderfully layered an 
ensemble.  Everything is so singularity clear and distinctive you can 
mentally tear it from its place in the song and examine it to your 
heart’s content.  The imaging vocally is kick ass good.    The only real
 issue is if you feed it crap, you see info that you might happily wish 
it would more melt into the whole.
Tonally and quantitatively it’s a little bit middy and a little bit open. 
 The smoothest high quality vocals are too expressively rendered to 
truly give you that creamy, melty, Galaxy advert type sumptuousness.  
There isn’t the thickness that works so well with creamy vocals.
Highs:  Much refinement, much 
detail, much nuance.  To be honest you wouldn’t have expected otherwise 
would you?  The difference is the more noticeable in big cans but it’s 
still noticeable with IEM’s too.  Things that are very easy to drive 
still manage to benefit from, well from what exactly I don’t know.   
Maybe it’s the extra headroom in available power?  Maybe it’s a slight 
inclination towards an open and detailed sound signature?  It’s not what
 I would ever call “bright” you know, things like the Icon mobile or the
 FireyeDA they are bright, they have that noticeable lift and dazzle in 
the upper end.  The Solo doesn’t really do that, it’s just a little more
 explicit all over.    Actually when you really, really start to look 
closely at the treble it’s pretty mild.  The initial metallic impact of a
 cymbal is ever so fractionally dampened.  The immediate rattle and 
decay are both effortlessly perfect.  Just exactly how I would want them
 to be but I know that being ever treble sensitive, there will be those 
that love the raw brutality of impact.
It’s curious in that its edge it a hint 
calmed yet its exceedingly high level of clarity otherwise makes the 
treble more noticeably distinct and clear.  So when you get 
elevated levels of clarity giving the impression of brightness you 
aren’t really, you are just getting more explicitly distinct treble.
Connectivity:  It’s a pretty clean 
and simple affair.  You get two pairs of phono connectors on the back, 
input 1 and input 2.  While in normal usage I dunno what I’d do with the
 second input but for reviewing?  Oh god trust me, it made my life 
soooooooooooo much easier.
Interface:  Super simple.  6.25mm 
headphone socket on the front.  Volume dial. Then lastly we have the 
input switch, it can be for input 1, input 2 or in the middle which 
makes no sound come out.  Effectively it acts as a mute button.
Power:  Gobs of it.  Not only did 
it continuously feel like it was never in the slightest straining or 
that it didn’t have endless reserves, it could go loud.  I never got the
 dial past 12 o’clock and that was with the HD600’s and with a fairly 
quiet recording.  It always felt like there was tons and tons of 
headroom left it you need or wanted it.
Dynamics:  Dynamics tends to be 
more headphone dependant but with the power availability it never did 
that, hint of volume decline when a song explodes out from silence.  
There was plenty of dynamic range to call upon at any instant.  It was 
perfectly happy to trundle along, meek and mild then rip your ears off. 
 Great for music but it did occur to me how much I don’t love that in 
movies.  Not that you buy the Solo for film watching but its dynamics I 
think could irk me after a while.
Transparency:  Exceedingly 
transparent.  Very open and detailed.  It does it too without being 
particularly breathy so you do retain much liquidity.  I suspect that’s 
where its “valvey” purported nature comes from.  Still, oodles and 
oodles of detail and transparency.
Build:  It’s a block of aluminium. 
 It has a hint of DIY esq charm as you can see clearly how the external 
casing is put together.  A bit of handmade craft like appeal about the 
thing.  It feels solid, sturdy and that if you dropped it it’ll chip 
your floor rather than explode on impact.
Value:  Hmm.  I’m not an idiot so I
 fully realise that we are in the realm of diminishing returns.  I 
realise that if I had the Solo SRGII here which is the near twin of the 
Solo Ultra Linear Diamond Edition that I have here, it’s circa £400 for 
the standard verses the £670 for this version.  Even comparing to the 
FiiO E7/E9 combo it would be silly to say that any high end audio 
equipment is “good value” but more do you get something of worth for 
your money.  The answer there is a clear yes.  The Solo Ultra Linear 
came in and quite effortlessly battered the snot out of every amp I 
have.  Sure it’s the most expensive so it should too.  It just opened up
 a new layer of performance from pretty much every single thing I 
plugged into it.  Even the itty bitty Trinity Hyperions I’ve been 
playing with lately.  I’m not saying that if I had £700 to play with I’d
 put £30 to the Hyperions and £670 to the Solo Ultra but if you’ve 
already got some first rate stuff, yes you will see an improvement over 
any mainstream output.  It’s not about getting great “value” it’s about 
eking all that you can, making your headphones be the best that they can
 be.
Conclusion:  Within a couple of 
days of getting the Solo Ultra in I came to a stark realisation.  That 
one it was very good but secondly that part of me wishes I’d never heard
 it.  You see as a rule I’m an IEM guy, that’s what I use most and they 
don’t really need oodles of power.  They also are for use on the go, not
 so much as being wedded to a desk.  Therefore I was happy with how 
everything performed and I had my E7/E9 combo for throwing a bit more 
power in when I wanted to.  In my head I knew it wasn’t the greatest 
desktop amp in the world but I was happy with it.  Now I’m not.
Spending hour after hour messing about 
with cables and headphones and IEM’s and amps and the variety of 
combinations you can make, the Solo Ultra just lifts everything it was 
hooked up to.  Sure it couldn’t make a £30 IEM challenge a £200 
one being played out of a meh source.  It’s not a magic wand.  It did 
however immediately offer a new layer, not only in quality and detail 
but it improved the acoustic layering.  I feel almost a little spoiled 
in what it can do to things and then to go back to my old set up feels 
as though something has been stolen.  That hint of life, of vibrancy, of
 dynamics, of nuance has just ever so slightly been taken away.  
Everything feels diminished and it makes me sad. 
The Solo Ultra Linear therefore stands quite easily head and shoulders above everything as the best amp I’ve ever encountered. 
 It’s that simple.  It is wonderful.  The however is that it’s of course
 not the cheapest amp I’ve ever encountered.  To most people out there 
it would simply be wild overkill to spend so much on an amp.  The fact 
is you pretty much always get a far bigger improvement in audio quality 
by putting it into a more expensive headphone than into an amp.  So if 
you don’t have a great pair or two of headphones then I’d strongly 
suggest you get them first.  Then when you want to make the your 
favourite headphone the very best it can be, maybe then have a think 
about the Solo Ultra, maybe give their home trial / loaner programme a 
bash and see if you like it as much as I have.
No comments:
Post a Comment